Demographics details for Conyers, GA vs Russellville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conyers, GA vs Russellville, KY.
Data | Conyers | Russellville |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,926 | 7,282 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $53,500 | $45,484 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Conyers vs Russellville
- In Conyers, the population is higher at 17,926, compared to 7,282 in Russellville.
- Residents in Conyers have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 35.9 years in Russellville.
- Conyers has a higher median income of $53,500 compared to $45,484 in Russellville.
- In Russellville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- The poverty level is higher in Russellville at 15%, compared to 14% in Conyers.
- The unemployment rate in Conyers is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Russellville.
Demographics
Demographics Conyers vs Russellville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Conyers | Russellville |
---|---|---|
Black | 62 | 14 |
White | 22 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conyers vs Russellville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conyers at 62% compared to 14% in Russellville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Russellville at 79% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- The Asian population is larger in Conyers at 2% compared to 1% in Russellville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conyers at 10% compared to 4% in Russellville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Conyers at 4% compared to 2% in Russellville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conyers and Russellville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Conyers | Russellville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.3% |
Depression | 20.1% | 28.3% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 42.8% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conyers vs Russellville
- In Russellville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.2% in Conyers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Russellville at 28.3% versus 20.1% in Conyers.
- Russellville has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 19.4% in Conyers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Russellville at 14.2% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Russellville has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 42.8% in Conyers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russellville at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Conyers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Conyers | Russellville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (204) | 1.1% (83) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (2,660) | 24.4% (1,780) |
Less than High School | 12.1% (2,169) | 12.4% (903) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,117) | 9.1% (665) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conyers vs Russellville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Conyers and Russellville at 1.1%.
- In Russellville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russellville at 12.4%, compared to 12.1% in Conyers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conyers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 9.1% in Russellville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.