Demographics details for Conyers, GA vs Roseville, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conyers, GA vs Roseville, MI.
Data | Conyers | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,926 | 46,812 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 40.7 years |
Median Income | $53,500 | $57,274 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Conyers vs Roseville
- The population in Roseville is higher at 46,812, compared to 17,926 in Conyers.
- The median age in Roseville is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 37.7 years in Conyers.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274, compared to $53,500 in Conyers.
- In Roseville, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- Conyers has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.2% in Conyers.
Demographics
Demographics Conyers vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Conyers | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Black | 62 | 23 |
White | 22 | 67 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conyers vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conyers at 62% compared to 23% in Roseville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roseville at 67% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- The Asian population is larger in Conyers at 2% compared to 1% in Roseville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conyers at 10% compared to 4% in Roseville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roseville at 5%, compared to 4% in Conyers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conyers and Roseville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Conyers | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.1% | 26.9% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 23.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 42.8% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conyers vs Roseville
- In Roseville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.2% in Conyers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Roseville at 26.9% versus 20.1% in Conyers.
- Roseville has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 19.4% in Conyers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 17.4% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conyers at 42.8% compared to 40.3% in Roseville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roseville at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Conyers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Conyers | Roseville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (204) | 1.2% (563) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (2,660) | 21.9% (10,268) |
Less than High School | 12.1% (2,169) | 14.8% (6,925) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,117) | 10.3% (4,839) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conyers vs Roseville
- In Roseville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Conyers.
- In Roseville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roseville at 14.8%, compared to 12.1% in Conyers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conyers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 10.3% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.