Demographics details for Conyers, GA vs Marshalltown, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conyers, GA vs Marshalltown, IA.
Data | Conyers | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,926 | 27,433 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $53,500 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Conyers vs Marshalltown
- The population in Marshalltown is higher at 27,433, compared to 17,926 in Conyers.
- Residents in Conyers have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 35.5 years in Marshalltown.
- Marshalltown has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $53,500 in Conyers.
- In Marshalltown, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- The poverty level is identical in both Conyers and Marshalltown at 14%.
- Marshalltown has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.2% in Conyers.
Demographics
Demographics Conyers vs Marshalltown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Conyers | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Black | 62 | 3 |
White | 22 | 45 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 10 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Conyers vs Marshalltown
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conyers at 62% compared to 3% in Marshalltown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshalltown at 45% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- In Marshalltown, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Conyers.
- Marshalltown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 10% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshalltown at 12%, compared to 4% in Conyers.
- In Marshalltown, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Conyers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Conyers | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.6% |
Depression | 20.1% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 20.7% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 42.8% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conyers vs Marshalltown
- More residents in Conyers report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Marshalltown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marshalltown at 23.0% versus 20.1% in Conyers.
- Marshalltown has a higher smoking rate at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Conyers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshalltown at 19.4% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conyers at 42.8% compared to 38.6% in Marshalltown.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Conyers and Marshalltown at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Conyers | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (204) | 2.4% (646) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (2,660) | 17.3% (4,740) |
Less than High School | 12.1% (2,169) | 23.6% (6,481) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (3,117) | 12.2% (3,347) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conyers vs Marshalltown
- In Marshalltown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.1% in Conyers.
- In Marshalltown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshalltown at 23.6%, compared to 12.1% in Conyers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conyers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 12.2% in Marshalltown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.