Demographics details for Convent, LA vs Mason, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Convent, LA vs Mason, OH.
| Data | Convent | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 552 | 35,520 |
| Median Age | 24.2 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,042 | $121,082 |
| Married Families | 16.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Convent vs Mason
- The population in Mason is higher at 35,520, compared to 552 in Convent.
- The median age in Mason is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 24.2 years in Convent.
- Mason has a higher median income of $121,082, compared to $41,042 in Convent.
- In Mason, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 16.0% in Convent.
- Convent has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Mason.
- Mason has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Convent.
Demographics
Demographics Convent vs Mason provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Convent | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 74 | 5 |
| White | 26 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Convent vs Mason
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Convent at 74% compared to 5% in Mason.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mason at 74% compared to 26% in Convent.
- In Mason, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Convent.
- Mason has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Convent.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mason at 4%, compared to 0% in Convent.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Convent and Mason at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Convent | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Convent vs Mason
- More residents in Convent report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.5% in Mason.
- Depression is more prevalent in Convent at 23.4% compared to 19.8% in Mason.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Convent at 24.6% compared to 11.8% in Mason.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mason at 19.1% compared to 16.2% in Convent.
- Obesity rates are higher in Convent at 43.3% compared to 33.5% in Mason.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mason at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Convent.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Convent | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (183) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (99) | 8.9% (3,151) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (37) | 3.0% (1,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (49) | 40.7% (14,469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Convent vs Mason
- In Mason, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Convent.
- A higher percentage of residents in Convent hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 8.9% in Mason.
- More residents in Convent have less than a high school education at 6.7% compared to 3.0% in Mason.
- In Mason, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.7% compared to 8.9% in Convent.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.