Demographics details for Conshohocken, PA vs Forest lake, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Conshohocken, PA vs Forest lake, MN.

Data Conshohocken Forest lake
Population 9,255 20,857
Median Age 32.3 years 37.9 years
Median Income $114,523 $91,157
Married Families 39.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Conshohocken vs Forest lake

  • The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 9,255 in Conshohocken.
  • The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 32.3 years in Conshohocken.
  • Conshohocken has a higher median income of $114,523 compared to $91,157 in Forest lake.
  • In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 39.0% in Conshohocken.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 5% in Conshohocken.
  • The unemployment rate in Conshohocken is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.

Demographics

Demographics Conshohocken vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Conshohocken Forest lake
Black 5 3
White 86 81
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Conshohocken vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conshohocken at 5% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
  • Conshohocken has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 81% in Forest lake.
  • In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Conshohocken.
  • Forest lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Conshohocken.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 4% in Conshohocken.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conshohocken and Forest lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Conshohocken Forest lake
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 8.8%
Depression 20.1% 24.1%
Smoking 11.6% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 21.4%
Obesity 30.2% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Conshohocken vs Forest lake

  • In Forest lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 13.8% in Conshohocken.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 20.1% in Conshohocken.
  • Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 11.6% in Conshohocken.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 19.4% in Conshohocken.
  • Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 30.2% in Conshohocken.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Conshohocken.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Conshohocken Forest lake
No Schooling 0.3% (26) 0.5% (101)
High School Diploma 14.0% (1,292) 14.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 4.2% (388) 7.7% (1,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.2% (4,643) 24.6% (5,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Conshohocken vs Forest lake

  • In Forest lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Conshohocken.
  • In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 14.0% in Conshohocken.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 4.2% in Conshohocken.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Conshohocken hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.2% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.