Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Port clinton, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Port clinton, OH.

Data Connersville Port clinton
Population 13,292 5,966
Median Age 40.6 years 44.9 years
Median Income $41,769 $55,534
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 13% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Connersville vs Port clinton

  • In Connersville, the population is higher at 13,292, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 40.6 years in Connersville.
  • Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Connersville and Port clinton at 35.0%.
  • Connersville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Port clinton.
  • The unemployment rate in Connersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Connersville vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Connersville Port clinton
Black 2 3
White 92 82
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Port clinton

  • In Port clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • Connersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 82% in Port clinton.
  • Both Connersville and Port clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Port clinton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port clinton at 8%, compared to 4% in Connersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Connersville and Port clinton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Connersville Port clinton
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 13.5%
Depression 28.7% 25.1%
Smoking 27.7% 24.0%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 17.9%
Obesity 43.0% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Port clinton

  • More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 19.2% in Port clinton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 25.1% in Port clinton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 24.0% in Port clinton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Port clinton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Connersville Port clinton
No Schooling 1.2% (155) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.8% (2,632) 21.7% (1,296)
Less than High School 24.7% (3,281) 17.1% (1,023)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,288) 13.8% (825)

Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Connersville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 19.8% in Connersville.
  • More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.