Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Lake leelanau, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Lake leelanau, MI.

Data Connersville Lake leelanau
Population 13,292 165
Median Age 40.6 years 27.9 years
Median Income $41,769 $48,125
Married Families 35.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Connersville vs Lake leelanau

  • In Connersville, the population is higher at 13,292, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • Residents in Connersville have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher median income of $48,125, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Connersville at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Connersville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
  • The unemployment rate in Connersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.

Demographics

Demographics Connersville vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Connersville Lake leelanau
Black 2 Data is updating
White 92 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Lake leelanau

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Connersville at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 92% in Connersville.
  • Both Connersville and Lake leelanau have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Connersville at 2% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Connersville at 4% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Connersville and Lake leelanau at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Connersville Lake leelanau
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 8.4%
Depression 28.7% 22.5%
Smoking 27.7% 12.5%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 18.9%
Obesity 43.0% 31.7%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Lake leelanau

  • More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 22.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Connersville and Lake leelanau at 24.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Connersville Lake leelanau
No Schooling 1.2% (155) 2.4% (4)
High School Diploma 19.8% (2,632) 13.3% (22)
Less than High School 24.7% (3,281) 4.8% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,288) 13.9% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Lake leelanau

  • In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.2% in Connersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Connersville hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
  • In Lake leelanau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.