Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Junction city, KS.

Data Connersville Junction city
Population 13,292 22,264
Median Age 40.6 years 28.5 years
Median Income $41,769 $60,709
Married Families 35.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 13% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.8

Population Comparison: Connersville vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 13,292 in Connersville.
  • Residents in Connersville have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Connersville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Connersville and Junction city at 13%.
  • Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in Connersville.

Demographics

Demographics Connersville vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Connersville Junction city
Black 2 20
White 92 43
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 2 18
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • Connersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Connersville.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 4% in Connersville.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Connersville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Connersville Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 11.0%
Depression 28.7% 19.2%
Smoking 27.7% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 16.6%
Obesity 43.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Junction city

  • More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 41.8% in Junction city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Connersville Junction city
No Schooling 1.2% (155) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 19.8% (2,632) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 24.7% (3,281) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,288) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Connersville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Connersville hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.