Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Glendale, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Glendale, AZ.
| Data | Connersville | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,292 | 252,136 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $41,769 | $66,375 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Connersville vs Glendale
- The population in Glendale is higher at 252,136, compared to 13,292 in Connersville.
- Residents in Connersville have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Connersville at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- Connersville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Glendale.
- The unemployment rate in Connersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Glendale.
Demographics
Demographics Connersville vs Glendale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Connersville | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 7 |
| White | 92 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Glendale
- In Glendale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Connersville.
- Connersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- In Glendale, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Connersville.
- Glendale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 2% in Connersville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glendale at 19%, compared to 4% in Connersville.
- In Glendale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Connersville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Connersville | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 27.7% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Glendale
- More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.4% in Glendale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 20.2% in Glendale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 17.2% in Glendale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Connersville | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (155) | 1.7% (4,190) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (2,632) | 14.7% (37,119) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (3,281) | 18.6% (46,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,288) | 14.2% (35,878) |
Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Glendale
- In Glendale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.2% in Connersville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Connersville hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
- More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 18.6% in Glendale.
- In Glendale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.