Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Fancy farm, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Fancy farm, KY.

Data Connersville Fancy farm
Population 13,292 300
Median Age 40.6 years 51.1 years
Median Income $41,769 $55,060
Married Families 35.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm

  • In Connersville, the population is higher at 13,292, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
  • The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 40.6 years in Connersville.
  • Fancy farm has a higher median income of $55,060, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Connersville at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
  • Connersville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
  • The unemployment rate in Connersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.

Demographics

Demographics Connersville vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Connersville Fancy farm
Black 2 3
White 92 91
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm

  • In Fancy farm, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • Connersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 91% in Fancy farm.
  • Both Connersville and Fancy farm have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Connersville at 2% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fancy farm at 6%, compared to 4% in Connersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Connersville and Fancy farm at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Connersville Fancy farm
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 12.6%
Depression 28.7% 27.3%
Smoking 27.7% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 16.7%
Obesity 43.0% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm

  • More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 17.9% in Fancy farm.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 27.3% in Fancy farm.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 20.6% in Fancy farm.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 37.4% in Fancy farm.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Fancy farm.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Connersville Fancy farm
No Schooling 1.2% (155) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.8% (2,632) 47.7% (143)
Less than High School 24.7% (3,281) 5.3% (16)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,288) 14.3% (43)

Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm

  • A higher percentage of residents in Connersville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
  • In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 19.8% in Connersville.
  • More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
  • In Fancy farm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.