Demographics details for Connersville, IN vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Connersville, IN vs Fancy farm, KY.
Data | Connersville | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,292 | 300 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 51.1 years |
Median Income | $41,769 | $55,060 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm
- In Connersville, the population is higher at 13,292, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 40.6 years in Connersville.
- Fancy farm has a higher median income of $55,060, compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Connersville at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- Connersville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- The unemployment rate in Connersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Connersville vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Connersville | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 92 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Connersville.
- Connersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 91% in Fancy farm.
- Both Connersville and Fancy farm have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Connersville at 2% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fancy farm at 6%, compared to 4% in Connersville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Connersville and Fancy farm at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Connersville | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.6% |
Depression | 28.7% | 27.3% |
Smoking | 27.7% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 43.0% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm
- More residents in Connersville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 17.9% in Fancy farm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Connersville at 28.7% compared to 27.3% in Fancy farm.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Connersville at 27.7% compared to 20.6% in Fancy farm.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Connersville at 43.0% compared to 37.4% in Fancy farm.
- Disability percentages are higher in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Fancy farm.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Connersville | Fancy farm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (155) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (2,632) | 47.7% (143) |
Less than High School | 24.7% (3,281) | 5.3% (16) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,288) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Connersville vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of residents in Connersville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 19.8% in Connersville.
- More residents in Connersville have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.