Demographics details for Conneaut, OH vs Shreveport, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conneaut, OH vs Shreveport, LA.
| Data | Conneaut | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,400 | 180,153 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,708 | $45,967 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Conneaut vs Shreveport
- The population in Shreveport is higher at 180,153, compared to 12,400 in Conneaut.
- Residents in Conneaut have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 37.1 years in Shreveport.
- Conneaut has a higher median income of $55,708 compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Conneaut at 31.0% compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
- The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 10% in Conneaut.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Conneaut and Shreveport at 5.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Conneaut vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Conneaut | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 58 |
| White | 86 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conneaut vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 7% in Conneaut.
- Conneaut has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 33% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Conneaut.
- Shreveport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Conneaut.
- Both Conneaut and Shreveport have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conneaut and Shreveport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Conneaut | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 27.0% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 45.5% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conneaut vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.4% in Conneaut.
- Depression is more prevalent in Conneaut at 25.4% compared to 24.4% in Shreveport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Conneaut at 27.0% compared to 24.3% in Shreveport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Conneaut at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Shreveport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conneaut at 45.5% compared to 42.5% in Shreveport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Conneaut at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Shreveport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Conneaut | Shreveport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (50) | 1.2% (2,087) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (3,319) | 18.3% (33,032) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (2,157) | 11.1% (20,070) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,411) | 18.6% (33,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conneaut vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Conneaut.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conneaut hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 18.3% in Shreveport.
- More residents in Conneaut have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 11.4% in Conneaut.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.