Demographics details for Conneaut, OH vs Montour falls, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conneaut, OH vs Montour falls, NY.
Data | Conneaut | Montour falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,400 | 1,583 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 44.8 years |
Median Income | $55,708 | $33,977 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Conneaut vs Montour falls
- In Conneaut, the population is higher at 12,400, compared to 1,583 in Montour falls.
- The median age in Montour falls is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 40.0 years in Conneaut.
- Conneaut has a higher median income of $55,708 compared to $33,977 in Montour falls.
- In Montour falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Conneaut.
- The poverty level is identical in both Conneaut and Montour falls at 10%.
- Montour falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Conneaut.
Demographics
Demographics Conneaut vs Montour falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Conneaut | Montour falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 2 |
White | 86 | 92 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Conneaut vs Montour falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conneaut at 7% compared to 2% in Montour falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Montour falls at 92% compared to 86% in Conneaut.
- The Asian population is larger in Conneaut at 1% compared to 0% in Montour falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conneaut at 2% compared to 1% in Montour falls.
- Both Conneaut and Montour falls have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Montour falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Conneaut.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Conneaut | Montour falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.3% |
Depression | 25.4% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 27.0% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 45.5% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conneaut vs Montour falls
- More residents in Conneaut report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Montour falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Conneaut at 25.4% compared to 25.1% in Montour falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Conneaut at 27.0% compared to 21.1% in Montour falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Montour falls at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Conneaut.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conneaut at 45.5% compared to 35.2% in Montour falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Montour falls at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Conneaut.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Conneaut | Montour falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (50) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.8% (3,319) | 25.2% (399) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (2,157) | 14.5% (230) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,411) | 15.5% (245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conneaut vs Montour falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Conneaut have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Montour falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conneaut hold a high school diploma at 26.8% compared to 25.2% in Montour falls.
- More residents in Conneaut have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 14.5% in Montour falls.
- In Montour falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 11.4% in Conneaut.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.