Demographics details for Conneaut, OH vs Gloverville, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conneaut, OH vs Gloverville, SC.
| Data | Conneaut | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,400 | 3,099 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 31.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,708 | $46,643 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Conneaut vs Gloverville
- In Conneaut, the population is higher at 12,400, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
- Residents in Conneaut have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
- Conneaut has a higher median income of $55,708 compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Conneaut at 31.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
- The poverty level is higher in Gloverville at 12%, compared to 10% in Conneaut.
- The unemployment rate in Conneaut is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Gloverville.
Demographics
Demographics Conneaut vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Conneaut | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 18 |
| White | 86 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conneaut vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 7% in Conneaut.
- Conneaut has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 76% in Gloverville.
- The Asian population is larger in Conneaut at 1% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- Gloverville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Conneaut.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Conneaut at 4% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conneaut and Gloverville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Conneaut | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 27.0% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 45.5% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conneaut vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.4% in Conneaut.
- Depression is more prevalent in Conneaut at 25.4% compared to 24.7% in Gloverville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Conneaut at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Gloverville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Conneaut at 18.4% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Conneaut at 45.5% compared to 39.3% in Gloverville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Conneaut.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Conneaut | Gloverville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (50) | 0.8% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 26.8% (3,319) | 29.9% (927) |
| Less than High School | 17.4% (2,157) | 19.7% (610) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (1,411) | 4.3% (134) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conneaut vs Gloverville
- In Gloverville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Conneaut.
- In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 26.8% in Conneaut.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gloverville at 19.7%, compared to 17.4% in Conneaut.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conneaut hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.