Demographics details for Confluence, PA vs Waukegan, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Confluence, PA vs Waukegan, IL.
| Data | Confluence | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 714 | 87,976 |
| Median Age | 54.8 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $54,432 | $66,077 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Confluence vs Waukegan
- The population in Waukegan is higher at 87,976, compared to 714 in Confluence.
- Residents in Confluence have a higher median age of 54.8 years compared to 34.5 years in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077, compared to $54,432 in Confluence.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Confluence and Waukegan at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Waukegan at 14%, compared to 10% in Confluence.
- Waukegan has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 5.0% in Confluence.
Demographics
Demographics Confluence vs Waukegan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Confluence | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 92 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Confluence vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Confluence.
- Confluence has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- In Waukegan, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Confluence.
- Waukegan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 1% in Confluence.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waukegan at 18%, compared to 5% in Confluence.
- In Waukegan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Confluence.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Confluence | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Confluence vs Waukegan
- More residents in Confluence report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.6% in Waukegan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Confluence at 24.3% compared to 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Confluence at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Waukegan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Confluence at 18.7% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Confluence at 39.7% compared to 39.3% in Waukegan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Confluence at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Waukegan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Confluence | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 3.1% (2,711) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (216) | 16.5% (14,503) |
| Less than High School | 8.0% (57) | 27.1% (23,842) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (82) | 13.9% (12,220) |
Education Levels Comparison: Confluence vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in Confluence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Confluence hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 16.5% in Waukegan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waukegan at 27.1%, compared to 8.0% in Confluence.
- In Waukegan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 11.5% in Confluence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.