Demographics details for Confluence, PA vs Saddle brook, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Confluence, PA vs Saddle brook, NJ.

Data Confluence Saddle brook
Population 714 13,930
Median Age 54.8 years 41.2 years
Median Income $54,432 $89,625
Married Families 35.0% 61.2%
Poverty Level 10% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 6.3

Population Comparison: Confluence vs Saddle brook

  • The population in Saddle brook is higher at 13,930, compared to 714 in Confluence.
  • Residents in Confluence have a higher median age of 54.8 years compared to 41.2 years in Saddle brook.
  • Saddle brook has a higher median income of $89,625, compared to $54,432 in Confluence.
  • In Saddle brook, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.2%, compared to 35.0% in Confluence.
  • Confluence has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Saddle brook.
  • Saddle brook has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 5.0% in Confluence.

Demographics

Demographics Confluence vs Saddle brook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Confluence Saddle brook
Black 2 2.1
White 92 73.6
Asian Data is updating 3.6
Hispanic 1 20.7
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Confluence vs Saddle brook

  • In Saddle brook, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2.1% compared to 2% in Confluence.
  • Confluence has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 73.6% in Saddle brook.
  • In Saddle brook, the Asian population stands at 3.6%, greater than 0% in Confluence.
  • Saddle brook has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20.7%, compared to 1% in Confluence.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Confluence at 5% compared to 0% in Saddle brook.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Confluence and Saddle brook at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Confluence Saddle brook
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 24.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 19.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Confluence vs Saddle brook

  • More residents in Confluence report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Confluence at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Confluence at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Confluence at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Confluence at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Confluence at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Confluence Saddle brook
No Schooling 0.3% (2) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 30.3% (216) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 8.0% (57) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.5% (82) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Confluence vs Saddle brook

  • A higher percentage of residents in Confluence have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Confluence hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • More residents in Confluence have less than a high school education at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Confluence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Saddle brook.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.