Demographics details for Concordia, KS vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concordia, KS vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Concordia | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,054 | 994 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $45,000 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Concordia vs Mc graw
- In Concordia, the population is higher at 5,054, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Concordia have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $45,000 in Concordia.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Concordia.
- Concordia has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in Concordia is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Concordia vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concordia | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concordia vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Concordia at 2% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to 87% in Concordia.
- Both Concordia and Mc graw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concordia at 7% compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 4% in Concordia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concordia and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concordia | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concordia vs Mc graw
- More residents in Concordia report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 21.9% in Concordia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Concordia at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concordia at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Mc graw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Concordia at 37.9% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Concordia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concordia | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (26) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (983) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 6.4% (324) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.6% (688) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concordia vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of residents in Concordia have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 19.4% in Concordia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 6.4% in Concordia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concordia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.