Demographics details for Concord, VT vs Leavenworth, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, VT vs Leavenworth, WA.
Data | Concord | Leavenworth |
---|---|---|
Population | 181 | 2,422 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $52,188 | $66,042 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Leavenworth
- The population in Leavenworth is higher at 2,422, compared to 181 in Concord.
- The median age in Leavenworth is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 38.6 years in Concord.
- Leavenworth has a higher median income of $66,042, compared to $52,188 in Concord.
- In Leavenworth, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 34.0% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Leavenworth.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Concord and Leavenworth at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Leavenworth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Concord | Leavenworth |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 96 | 87 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Leavenworth
- In Leavenworth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 87% in Leavenworth.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 4% compared to 1% in Leavenworth.
- Leavenworth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leavenworth at 4%, compared to 0% in Concord.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concord and Leavenworth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Concord | Leavenworth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.7% |
Depression | 26.9% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 12.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 35.5% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Leavenworth
- More residents in Concord report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Leavenworth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Concord at 26.9% compared to 26.5% in Leavenworth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Concord at 21.5% compared to 12.1% in Leavenworth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Leavenworth at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Concord.
- Obesity rates are higher in Concord at 35.5% compared to 28.2% in Leavenworth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Concord at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Leavenworth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Concord | Leavenworth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (5) |
High School Diploma | 13.3% (24) | 11.3% (273) |
Less than High School | 18.2% (33) | 9.0% (218) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (38) | 36.2% (876) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Leavenworth
- In Leavenworth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 11.3% in Leavenworth.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 18.2% compared to 9.0% in Leavenworth.
- In Leavenworth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 21.0% in Concord.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.