Demographics details for Concord, NH vs Maricopa, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, NH vs Maricopa, AZ.
| Data | Concord | Maricopa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,503 | 66,290 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $77,874 | $88,795 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Maricopa
- The population in Maricopa is higher at 66,290, compared to 44,503 in Concord.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.7 years in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher median income of $88,795, compared to $77,874 in Concord.
- In Maricopa, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Concord.
- The poverty level is identical in both Concord and Maricopa at 10%.
- Maricopa has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.2% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Maricopa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Maricopa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | 84 | 42 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Maricopa
- In Maricopa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 42% in Maricopa.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 4% compared to 2% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 4% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maricopa at 14%, compared to 4% in Concord.
- In Maricopa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Concord.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Maricopa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 31.1% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Maricopa
- In Maricopa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Concord at 23.5% compared to 18.6% in Maricopa.
- Maricopa has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maricopa at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Concord.
- Maricopa has higher obesity rates at 35.4% compared to 31.1% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Concord at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Maricopa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Maricopa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (386) | 0.4% (254) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (7,262) | 15.3% (10,156) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (4,370) | 8.2% (5,413) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (12,651) | 13.4% (8,850) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Maricopa
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Maricopa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 15.3% in Maricopa.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 9.8% compared to 8.2% in Maricopa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 13.4% in Maricopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.