Demographics details for Concord, NH vs Columbus, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, NH vs Columbus, TX.
| Data | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,503 | 3,714 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 47.0 years |
| Median Income | $77,874 | $56,250 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Concord, the population is higher at 44,503, compared to 3,714 in Columbus.
- The median age in Columbus is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 40.1 years in Concord.
- Concord has a higher median income of $77,874 compared to $56,250 in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Concord.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 12%, compared to 10% in Concord.
- Columbus has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.2% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 16 |
| White | 84 | 58 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 58% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 4% compared to 1% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 4% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbus at 5%, compared to 4% in Concord.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Concord at 1% compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 31.1% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Concord at 23.5% compared to 21.8% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbus at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Concord.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 31.1% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are higher in Concord at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (386) | 2.3% (87) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (7,262) | 25.1% (934) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (4,370) | 18.8% (699) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (12,651) | 19.1% (710) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.9% in Concord.
- In Columbus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 16.3% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbus at 18.8%, compared to 9.8% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 19.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.