Demographics details for Concord, NC vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, NC vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Concord | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,896 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $83,480 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 109,896 in Concord.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Concord has a higher median income of $83,480 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Concord at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 11% in Concord.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.9% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | 21 |
| White | 54 | 10 |
| Asian | 6 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Lancaster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Concord and Lancaster at 21%.
- Concord has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 6% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 13% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 6% in Concord.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Concord.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 15.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.5% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Concord at 23.7% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Concord at 15.9% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concord at 16.8% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Concord at 33.6% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (838) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (13,853) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (10,845) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (28,330) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Concord.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 12.6% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 9.9% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.