Demographics details for Concord, NC vs Kaysville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, NC vs Kaysville, UT.
Data | Concord | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,896 | 32,761 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 32.1 years |
Median Income | $83,480 | $121,867 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Kaysville
- In Concord, the population is higher at 109,896, compared to 32,761 in Kaysville.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 32.1 years in Kaysville.
- Kaysville has a higher median income of $121,867, compared to $83,480 in Concord.
- In Kaysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The unemployment rate in Concord is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.7% in Kaysville.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Kaysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Concord | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | Data is updating |
White | 54 | 88 |
Asian | 6 | 1 |
Hispanic | 13 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Concord at 21% compared to 0% in Kaysville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kaysville at 88% compared to 54% in Concord.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 6% compared to 1% in Kaysville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 13% compared to 5% in Kaysville.
- Both Concord and Kaysville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concord and Kaysville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Concord | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 8.7% |
Depression | 23.7% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 11.4% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Kaysville
- More residents in Concord report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in Kaysville.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.7%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Concord at 15.9% compared to 6.7% in Kaysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concord at 16.8% compared to 11.4% in Kaysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Concord at 33.6% compared to 31.6% in Kaysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Concord at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Kaysville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Concord | Kaysville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (838) | 0.4% (141) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (13,853) | 6.1% (1,986) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (10,845) | 2.6% (859) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (28,330) | 28.5% (9,340) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Kaysville
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Kaysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 6.1% in Kaysville.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 2.6% in Kaysville.
- In Kaysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 25.8% in Concord.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.