Demographics details for Concord, NC vs Broken bow, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, NC vs Broken bow, NE.
Data | Concord | Broken bow |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,896 | 3,474 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 41.4 years |
Median Income | $83,480 | $49,425 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Broken bow
- In Concord, the population is higher at 109,896, compared to 3,474 in Broken bow.
- The median age in Broken bow is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in Concord.
- Concord has a higher median income of $83,480 compared to $49,425 in Broken bow.
- In Broken bow, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Concord.
- The poverty level is identical in both Concord and Broken bow at 11%.
- The unemployment rate in Concord is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Broken bow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Concord | Broken bow |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 2 |
White | 54 | 88 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 13 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Broken bow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Concord at 21% compared to 2% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broken bow at 88% compared to 54% in Concord.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 6% compared to 0% in Broken bow.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 13% compared to 6% in Broken bow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Concord at 6% compared to 4% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concord and Broken bow at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Concord | Broken bow |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 10.0% |
Depression | 23.7% | 17.1% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 16.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 20.7% |
Obesity | 33.6% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Broken bow
- More residents in Concord report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Concord at 23.7% compared to 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Broken bow has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 15.9% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Broken bow at 20.7% compared to 16.8% in Concord.
- Broken bow has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 33.6% in Concord.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Broken bow at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Concord | Broken bow |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (838) | 1.2% (42) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (13,853) | 19.8% (689) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (10,845) | 7.3% (253) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (28,330) | 14.7% (512) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Broken bow
- In Broken bow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Concord.
- In Broken bow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 12.6% in Concord.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 14.7% in Broken bow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.