Demographics details for Concord, CA vs Rock springs, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, CA vs Rock springs, WY.
Data | Concord | Rock springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 122,625 | 23,021 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $107,789 | $75,863 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Rock springs
- In Concord, the population is higher at 122,625, compared to 23,021 in Rock springs.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Rock springs.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789 compared to $75,863 in Rock springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Concord at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Rock springs.
- The poverty level is identical in both Concord and Rock springs at 11%.
- The unemployment rate in Concord is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Rock springs.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Rock springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Concord | Rock springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 33 | 71 |
Asian | 14 | 1 |
Hispanic | 32 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Rock springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Concord at 4% compared to 2% in Rock springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rock springs at 71% compared to 33% in Concord.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 14% compared to 1% in Rock springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 32% compared to 16% in Rock springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Concord at 16% compared to 9% in Rock springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concord and Rock springs at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Concord | Rock springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 10.7% |
Depression | 17.8% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 10.7% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 25.6% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Rock springs
- In Rock springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rock springs at 20.1% versus 17.8% in Concord.
- Rock springs has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rock springs at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Concord.
- Rock springs has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rock springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Concord | Rock springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (2,147) | 1.0% (234) |
High School Diploma | 13.0% (15,969) | 15.5% (3,575) |
Less than High School | 15.7% (19,274) | 9.6% (2,204) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (33,174) | 13.9% (3,211) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Rock springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.0% in Rock springs.
- In Rock springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 9.6% in Rock springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 13.9% in Rock springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.