Demographics details for Concord, CA vs Middle river, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, CA vs Middle river, MD.
| Data | Concord | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122,625 | 31,155 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $107,789 | $72,970 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Middle river
- In Concord, the population is higher at 122,625, compared to 31,155 in Middle river.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789 compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Concord at 42.0% compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
- Concord has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Middle river.
- The unemployment rate in Concord is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Middle river.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 29 |
| White | 33 | 51 |
| Asian | 14 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Middle river
- In Middle river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 4% in Concord.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middle river at 51% compared to 33% in Concord.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 14% compared to 7% in Middle river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 32% compared to 8% in Middle river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Concord at 16% compared to 5% in Middle river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Concord at 1% compared to 0% in Middle river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middle river at 24.1% versus 17.8% in Concord.
- Middle river has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concord at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Middle river.
- Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (2,147) | 2.6% (818) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (15,969) | 20.1% (6,254) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (19,274) | 14.8% (4,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (33,174) | 19.4% (6,048) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.8% in Concord.
- In Middle river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 14.8% in Middle river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.