Demographics details for Concord, CA vs Columbus, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, CA vs Columbus, MS.
| Data | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122,625 | 23,273 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $107,789 | $38,954 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Concord, the population is higher at 122,625, compared to 23,273 in Columbus.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.5 years in Columbus.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789 compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Concord at 42.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 19%, compared to 11% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Concord is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.8% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 66 |
| White | 33 | 28 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 4% in Concord.
- Concord has a higher percentage of White residents at 33% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 14% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 32% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Concord at 16% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Concord at 1% compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 44.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbus at 20.0% versus 17.8% in Concord.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concord at 17.0% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Concord and Columbus at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (2,147) | 1.1% (260) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (15,969) | 18.4% (4,272) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (19,274) | 11.0% (2,559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (33,174) | 17.1% (3,971) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- More residents in Concord have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.