Demographics details for Concord, CA vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Concord, CA vs Clarksville, AR.
| Data | Concord | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 122,625 | 9,555 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $107,789 | $35,911 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Concord vs Clarksville
- In Concord, the population is higher at 122,625, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Concord have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Concord has a higher median income of $107,789 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Concord at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 11% in Concord.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Concord vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Concord | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 33 | 60 |
| Asian | 14 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Concord vs Clarksville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Concord at 4% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksville at 60% compared to 33% in Concord.
- The Asian population is larger in Concord at 14% compared to 6% in Clarksville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Concord at 32% compared to 23% in Clarksville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Concord at 16% compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Concord and Clarksville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Concord | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Concord vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.9% in Concord.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 17.8% in Concord.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 10.7% in Concord.
- Binge drinking is more common in Concord at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 25.6% in Concord.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Concord.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Concord | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (2,147) | 4.2% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (15,969) | 21.6% (2,064) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (19,274) | 28.6% (2,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (33,174) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Concord vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.8% in Concord.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 13.0% in Concord.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 15.7% in Concord.
- A higher percentage of residents in Concord hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.