Demographics details for Commerce, TX vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Commerce, TX vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Commerce | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,282 | 681 |
| Median Age | 24.1 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $41,382 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Commerce vs Friendship
- In Commerce, the population is higher at 9,282, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 24.1 years in Commerce.
- Friendship has a higher median income of $45,208, compared to $41,382 in Commerce.
- In Friendship, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 24.0% in Commerce.
- Commerce has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Friendship.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Commerce and Friendship at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Commerce vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Commerce | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 5 |
| White | 50 | 84 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Commerce vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Commerce at 22% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 50% in Commerce.
- The Asian population is larger in Commerce at 3% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Commerce at 16% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 8% in Commerce.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Commerce and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Commerce | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Commerce vs Friendship
- More residents in Commerce report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Commerce at 25.7% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 21.0% in Commerce.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 15.7% in Commerce.
- Obesity rates are higher in Commerce at 44.2% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Commerce.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Commerce | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (8) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (1,010) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (968) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (1,181) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Commerce vs Friendship
- In Friendship, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Commerce.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 10.9% in Commerce.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 10.4% in Commerce.
- A higher percentage of residents in Commerce hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.