Demographics details for Columbus, OH vs Aberdeen, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, OH vs Aberdeen, MD.
| Data | Columbus | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 907,971 | 16,859 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $62,994 | $74,555 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Aberdeen
- In Columbus, the population is higher at 907,971, compared to 16,859 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Aberdeen is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 32.7 years in Columbus.
- Aberdeen has a higher median income of $74,555, compared to $62,994 in Columbus.
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Aberdeen.
- The unemployment rate in Columbus is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Aberdeen.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbus | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 24 |
| White | 51 | 52 |
| Asian | 6 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbus at 29% compared to 24% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aberdeen at 52% compared to 51% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 6% compared to 4% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aberdeen at 9%, compared to 7% in Columbus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbus and Aberdeen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbus | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Aberdeen
- More residents in Columbus report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.2% in Aberdeen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbus at 23.9% compared to 22.2% in Aberdeen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 19.6% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbus at 17.7% compared to 14.0% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 38.0% compared to 37.4% in Aberdeen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbus | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (12,592) | 0.6% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (130,716) | 15.2% (2,565) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (87,770) | 13.9% (2,349) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.2% (229,071) | 18.1% (3,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Aberdeen.
- In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 13.9%, compared to 9.7% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 18.1% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.