Demographics details for Columbus, MS vs Sherwood, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, MS vs Sherwood, AR.
| Data | Columbus | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,273 | 33,082 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,954 | $74,917 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Sherwood
- The population in Sherwood is higher at 33,082, compared to 23,273 in Columbus.
- The median age in Sherwood is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 38.5 years in Columbus.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $74,917, compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Sherwood.
- The unemployment rate in Columbus is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbus | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 28 |
| White | 28 | 64 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbus at 66% compared to 28% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 64% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 2% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sherwood at 4%, compared to 2% in Columbus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbus and Sherwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbus | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 44.8% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Sherwood
- More residents in Columbus report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Sherwood.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sherwood at 23.9% versus 20.0% in Columbus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Sherwood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sherwood at 14.6% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 44.8% compared to 35.7% in Sherwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbus | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (260) | 0.6% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (4,272) | 13.9% (4,592) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (2,559) | 6.9% (2,280) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (3,971) | 22.9% (7,568) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- More residents in Columbus have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.