Environment details: Columbus MS
water quality is poor; filtration advised.
Environment details: Scott city KS
Low quality; significant pollutant sources.
Compare Environment: Columbus MS vs Scott city KS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Columbus | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 478 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is poor; filtration advised. | Low quality; significant pollutant sources. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.57 | 1.77 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 24 | 25 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Columbus vs Scott city
- Both cities report the same water quality at 3/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Scott city with an average index of 1.77 compared to 1.57 in Columbus.
- Scott city experiences more days with poor air quality at 25 compared to 24 in Columbus.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.