Demographics details for Columbus, MS vs Harwich port, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, MS vs Harwich port, MA.
Data | Columbus | Harwich port |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,273 | 2,252 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 63.5 years |
Median Income | $38,954 | $58,854 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Harwich port
- In Columbus, the population is higher at 23,273, compared to 2,252 in Harwich port.
- The median age in Harwich port is higher at 63.5 years, compared to 38.5 years in Columbus.
- Harwich port has a higher median income of $58,854, compared to $38,954 in Columbus.
- In Harwich port, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Harwich port.
- The unemployment rate in Columbus is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Harwich port.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Harwich port provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Columbus | Harwich port |
---|---|---|
Black | 66 | 1 |
White | 28 | 95 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Harwich port
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbus at 66% compared to 1% in Harwich port.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harwich port at 95% compared to 28% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 2% compared to 0% in Harwich port.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Columbus and Harwich port at 2%.
- Both Columbus and Harwich port have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbus and Harwich port at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Columbus | Harwich port |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 8.7% |
Depression | 20.0% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 44.8% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Harwich port
- More residents in Columbus report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.1% in Harwich port.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harwich port at 24.2% versus 20.0% in Columbus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 21.0% compared to 12.4% in Harwich port.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harwich port at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Columbus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 44.8% compared to 28.6% in Harwich port.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harwich port at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Columbus | Harwich port |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (260) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (4,272) | 8.6% (193) |
Less than High School | 11.0% (2,559) | 2.5% (56) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (3,971) | 52.0% (1,171) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Harwich port
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Harwich port.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 8.6% in Harwich port.
- More residents in Columbus have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 2.5% in Harwich port.
- In Harwich port, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.0% compared to 17.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.