Demographics details for Columbus, IN vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, IN vs Sacramento, CA.
Data | Columbus | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Population | 51,268 | 528,001 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $75,114 | $78,954 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 51,268 in Columbus.
- Residents in Columbus have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Sacramento has a higher median income of $78,954, compared to $75,114 in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Columbus at 41.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Columbus | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 12 |
White | 71 | 26 |
Asian | 13 | 19 |
Hispanic | 9 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 13% in Columbus.
- Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 5% in Columbus.
- In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Columbus | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 11.5% |
Depression | 24.1% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.6% in Columbus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbus at 24.1% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 36.7% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbus at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Columbus | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (398) | 2.7% (14,512) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (7,340) | 11.7% (62,039) |
Less than High School | 9.1% (4,677) | 14.7% (77,760) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.1% (14,382) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacramento at 14.7%, compared to 9.1% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 24.4% in Sacramento.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.