Demographics details for Columbus, IN vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, IN vs Farmington, WV.
| Data | Columbus | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,268 | 397 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $75,114 | $54,750 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Farmington
- In Columbus, the population is higher at 51,268, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 35.8 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $75,114 compared to $54,750 in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 10%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbus | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 71 | 100 |
| Asian | 13 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbus at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 71% in Columbus.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 13% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Columbus at 9% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Columbus at 5% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbus and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbus | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 15.6% in Columbus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 24.1% in Columbus.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.3% in Columbus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Farmington has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.7% in Columbus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbus | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (398) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (7,340) | 31.5% (125) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (4,677) | 8.1% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.1% (14,382) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 14.3% in Columbus.
- More residents in Columbus have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.