Demographics details for Columbus, IN vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, IN vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Columbus | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,268 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $75,114 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Fairburn
- In Columbus, the population is higher at 51,268, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Columbus have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $75,114 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Columbus at 41.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbus | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 73 |
| White | 71 | 12 |
| Asian | 13 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 2% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 13% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Columbus at 5% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbus and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbus | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Fairburn
- More residents in Columbus report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbus at 24.1% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 36.7% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbus at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbus | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (398) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (7,340) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (4,677) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.1% (14,382) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Columbus have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.