Demographics details for Columbus, IN vs Fair oaks, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbus, IN vs Fair oaks, CA.
| Data | Columbus | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,268 | 32,754 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $75,114 | $112,138 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbus vs Fair oaks
- In Columbus, the population is higher at 51,268, compared to 32,754 in Fair oaks.
- The median age in Fair oaks is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 35.8 years in Columbus.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138, compared to $75,114 in Columbus.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics Columbus vs Fair oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbus | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 71 | 68 |
| Asian | 13 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Columbus vs Fair oaks
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Columbus and Fair oaks at 2%.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 68% in Fair oaks.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbus at 13% compared to 5% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 9% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fair oaks at 10%, compared to 5% in Columbus.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbus | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbus vs Fair oaks
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Columbus and Fair oaks at 15.6%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbus at 24.1% compared to 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Columbus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbus at 36.7% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbus at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbus | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (398) | 1.0% (312) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (7,340) | 9.5% (3,112) |
| Less than High School | 9.1% (4,677) | 4.9% (1,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.1% (14,382) | 35.4% (11,579) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbus vs Fair oaks
- In Fair oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbus hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- More residents in Columbus have less than a high school education at 9.1% compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 28.1% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.