Demographics details for Columbiana, OH vs Litchfield park, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Columbiana, OH vs Litchfield park, AZ.

Data Columbiana Litchfield park
Population 100,511 6,960
Median Age 44.5 years 47.7 years
Median Income $55,473 $117,601
Married Families 40.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.8 5.1

Population Comparison: Columbiana vs Litchfield park

  • In Columbiana, the population is higher at 100,511, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 44.5 years in Columbiana.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $55,473 in Columbiana.
  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 40.0% in Columbiana.
  • Columbiana has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
  • The unemployment rate in Columbiana is higher at 5.8%, compared to 5.1% in Litchfield park.

Demographics

Demographics Columbiana vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Columbiana Litchfield park
Black 2 2
White 93 57
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 2 23
Two or More Races 3 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Columbiana vs Litchfield park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Columbiana and Litchfield park at 2%.
  • Columbiana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Columbiana.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Columbiana.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 3% in Columbiana.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbiana and Litchfield park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Columbiana Litchfield park
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 8.3%
Depression 23.8% 18.9%
Smoking 22.5% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 18.9%
Obesity 45.3% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Columbiana vs Litchfield park

  • More residents in Columbiana report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Columbiana at 23.8% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Columbiana at 22.5% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Columbiana.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Columbiana at 45.3% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Columbiana at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Columbiana Litchfield park
No Schooling 1.0% (1,010) 0.2% (16)
High School Diploma 29.8% (29,903) 11.2% (777)
Less than High School 14.3% (14,400) 2.2% (150)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (12,129) 36.0% (2,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Columbiana vs Litchfield park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents in Columbiana have less than a high school education at 14.3% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 12.1% in Columbiana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.