Demographics details for Columbiana, OH vs Heyburn, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbiana, OH vs Heyburn, ID.
| Data | Columbiana | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,511 | 3,640 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,473 | $61,443 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbiana vs Heyburn
- In Columbiana, the population is higher at 100,511, compared to 3,640 in Heyburn.
- Residents in Columbiana have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 26.5 years in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has a higher median income of $61,443, compared to $55,473 in Columbiana.
- In Heyburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Columbiana.
- The poverty level is higher in Heyburn at 11%, compared to 10% in Columbiana.
- The unemployment rate in Columbiana is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Heyburn.
Demographics
Demographics Columbiana vs Heyburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbiana | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 93 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Columbiana vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbiana at 2% compared to 0% in Heyburn.
- Columbiana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 70% in Heyburn.
- Both Columbiana and Heyburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Heyburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Columbiana.
- Both Columbiana and Heyburn have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- In Heyburn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Columbiana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbiana | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbiana vs Heyburn
- More residents in Columbiana report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.8% in Heyburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbiana at 23.8% compared to 22.9% in Heyburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbiana at 22.5% compared to 18.5% in Heyburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbiana at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Heyburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbiana at 45.3% compared to 37.2% in Heyburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbiana at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Heyburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbiana | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (1,010) | 0.4% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (29,903) | 20.5% (745) |
| Less than High School | 14.3% (14,400) | 19.1% (694) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (12,129) | 12.3% (447) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbiana vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Heyburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 20.5% in Heyburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heyburn at 19.1%, compared to 14.3% in Columbiana.
- In Heyburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 12.1% in Columbiana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.