Demographics details for Columbiana, OH vs Freeland, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbiana, OH vs Freeland, MI.
| Data | Columbiana | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,511 | 7,357 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,473 | $95,478 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbiana vs Freeland
- In Columbiana, the population is higher at 100,511, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- Residents in Columbiana have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478, compared to $55,473 in Columbiana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Columbiana at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Freeland.
- Columbiana has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Columbiana is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Columbiana vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbiana | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 93 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Columbiana vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Columbiana.
- Columbiana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 76% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Columbiana.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Columbiana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeland at 8%, compared to 3% in Columbiana.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Columbiana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbiana | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbiana vs Freeland
- More residents in Columbiana report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbiana at 23.8% compared to 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbiana at 22.5% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Columbiana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbiana at 45.3% compared to 37.8% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbiana at 17.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbiana | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (1,010) | 0.7% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 29.8% (29,903) | 13.8% (1,014) |
| Less than High School | 14.3% (14,400) | 7.4% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (12,129) | 21.8% (1,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbiana vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbiana hold a high school diploma at 29.8% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- More residents in Columbiana have less than a high school education at 14.3% compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 12.1% in Columbiana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.