Demographics details for Columbia, SC vs Meade, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, SC vs Meade, KS.
| Data | Columbia | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139,698 | 3,897 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,095 | $74,063 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Meade
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 139,698, compared to 3,897 in Meade.
- The median age in Meade is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Meade has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
- In Meade, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Meade.
- The unemployment rate in Columbia is higher at 5.8%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbia | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 1 |
| White | 48 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Meade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 40% compared to 1% in Meade.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meade at 69% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbia at 2% compared to 1% in Meade.
- Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meade at 6%, compared to 5% in Columbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Meade at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbia | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Meade
- More residents in Columbia report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Meade.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbia at 20.8% compared to 20.0% in Meade.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbia at 19.1% compared to 18.2% in Meade.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meade at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 39.0% in Columbia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbia | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (555) | 0.2% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (11,712) | 13.7% (532) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (8,257) | 18.0% (701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (34,575) | 15.9% (619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Meade
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
- In Meade, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meade at 18.0%, compared to 5.9% in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 15.9% in Meade.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.