Demographics details for Columbia, SC vs Lake park, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, SC vs Lake park, IA.
Data | Columbia | Lake park |
---|---|---|
Population | 139,698 | 1,173 |
Median Age | 28.3 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $54,095 | $75,476 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Lake park
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 139,698, compared to 1,173 in Lake park.
- The median age in Lake park is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Lake park has a higher median income of $75,476, compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
- In Lake park, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 4% in Lake park.
- The unemployment rate in Columbia is higher at 5.8%, compared to 2.1% in Lake park.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Lake park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Columbia | Lake park |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | Data is updating |
White | 48 | 93 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Lake park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 40% compared to 0% in Lake park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake park at 93% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbia at 2% compared to 0% in Lake park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Columbia at 5% compared to 4% in Lake park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Columbia at 5% compared to 3% in Lake park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Lake park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Columbia | Lake park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.9% |
Depression | 20.8% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Lake park
- More residents in Columbia report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.8% in Lake park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbia at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Lake park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbia at 19.1% compared to 16.1% in Lake park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake park at 23.5% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbia at 39.0% compared to 37.1% in Lake park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Lake park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Columbia | Lake park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (555) | 0.3% (3) |
High School Diploma | 8.4% (11,712) | 26.5% (311) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (8,257) | 1.4% (16) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (34,575) | 10.4% (122) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Lake park
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Lake park.
- In Lake park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- More residents in Columbia have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 1.4% in Lake park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 10.4% in Lake park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.