Demographics details for Columbia, SC vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, SC vs Grafton, WI.
| Data | Columbia | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 139,698 | 12,433 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 43.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,095 | $83,500 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Grafton
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 139,698, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- The median age in Grafton is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
- In Grafton, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate in Columbia is higher at 5.8%, compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbia | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 2 |
| White | 48 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 40% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grafton at 87% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- Both Columbia and Grafton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Columbia at 5% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- Both Columbia and Grafton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbia | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Grafton
- More residents in Columbia report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grafton at 21.0% versus 20.8% in Columbia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbia at 19.1% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbia at 39.0% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbia | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (555) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (11,712) | 12.9% (1,600) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (8,257) | 3.1% (384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (34,575) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.9% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- More residents in Columbia have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 24.7% in Columbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.