Demographics details for Columbia, MO vs Harrison, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, MO vs Harrison, AR.
| Data | Columbia | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,555 | 13,338 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,455 | $39,677 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Harrison
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 128,555, compared to 13,338 in Harrison.
- The median age in Harrison is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 28.8 years in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher median income of $60,455 compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- In Harrison, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in Columbia.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Harrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbia | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 92 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Harrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 11% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrison at 92% compared to 73% in Columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbia at 6% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Columbia and Harrison at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Columbia at 6% compared to 4% in Harrison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Harrison at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbia | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.7% in Columbia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrison at 28.9% versus 25.3% in Columbia.
- Harrison has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 16.3% in Columbia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbia at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Harrison has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 33.5% in Columbia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harrison at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbia | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (845) | 0.9% (115) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (9,965) | 21.0% (2,807) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (5,383) | 12.5% (1,665) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (39,270) | 13.1% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Columbia.
- In Harrison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 7.8% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrison at 12.5%, compared to 4.2% in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.