Demographics details for Columbia, MO vs Ferndale, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, MO vs Ferndale, MI.
Data | Columbia | Ferndale |
---|---|---|
Population | 128,555 | 18,969 |
Median Age | 28.8 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $60,455 | $86,120 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Ferndale
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 128,555, compared to 18,969 in Ferndale.
- The median age in Ferndale is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 28.8 years in Columbia.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $86,120, compared to $60,455 in Columbia.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Columbia and Ferndale at 32.0%.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 10% in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.8% in Columbia.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Ferndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Columbia | Ferndale |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 6 |
White | 73 | 81 |
Asian | 6 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Ferndale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 11% compared to 6% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ferndale at 81% compared to 73% in Columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in Columbia at 6% compared to 3% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Columbia and Ferndale at 4%.
- Both Columbia and Ferndale have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Columbia and Ferndale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Columbia | Ferndale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.7% |
Depression | 25.3% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 30.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Ferndale
- More residents in Columbia report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.6% in Ferndale.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbia at 25.3% compared to 21.1% in Ferndale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbia at 16.3% compared to 12.7% in Ferndale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ferndale at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Columbia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbia at 33.5% compared to 30.4% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Ferndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Columbia | Ferndale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (845) | 0.4% (81) |
High School Diploma | 7.8% (9,965) | 11.3% (2,139) |
Less than High School | 4.2% (5,383) | 6.0% (1,132) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (39,270) | 45.0% (8,533) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Ferndale
- A higher percentage of residents in Columbia have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.3% compared to 7.8% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ferndale at 6.0%, compared to 4.2% in Columbia.
- In Ferndale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 30.5% in Columbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.