Demographics details for Columbia, MO vs Costa mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Columbia, MO vs Costa mesa, CA.
| Data | Columbia | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,555 | 109,521 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $60,455 | $104,981 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Columbia vs Costa mesa
- In Columbia, the population is higher at 128,555, compared to 109,521 in Costa mesa.
- The median age in Costa mesa is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 28.8 years in Columbia.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $60,455 in Columbia.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Columbia is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Columbia vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Columbia | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 40 |
| Asian | 6 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Columbia vs Costa mesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Columbia at 11% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
- Columbia has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 6% in Columbia.
- Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 4% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 6% in Columbia.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Columbia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Columbia | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Columbia vs Costa mesa
- More residents in Columbia report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Columbia at 25.3% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Columbia at 16.3% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Columbia at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Costa mesa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Columbia at 33.5% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Columbia | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (845) | 1.8% (2,006) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (9,965) | 11.3% (12,406) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (5,383) | 17.3% (18,969) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (39,270) | 31.2% (34,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Columbia vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.7% in Columbia.
- In Costa mesa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.3% compared to 7.8% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Costa mesa at 17.3%, compared to 4.2% in Columbia.
- In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 30.5% in Columbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.