Demographics details for Colton, OR vs Norway, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colton, OR vs Norway, IA.
Data | Colton | Norway |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,012 | 466 |
Median Age | 45.5 years | 48.3 years |
Median Income | $90,938 | $90,000 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Colton vs Norway
- In Colton, the population is higher at 5,012, compared to 466 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 45.5 years in Colton.
- Colton has a higher median income of $90,938 compared to $90,000 in Norway.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 47.0% in Colton.
- Colton has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The unemployment rate in Colton is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Colton vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Colton | Norway |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 89 | 100 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Colton vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Colton at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 100% compared to 89% in Colton.
- The Asian population is larger in Colton at 4% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Colton at 2% compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Colton at 4% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Colton and Norway at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Colton | Norway |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.4% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 22.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 36.8% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colton vs Norway
- In Norway, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Colton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norway at 17.5% versus 0.0% in Colton.
- Norway has a higher smoking rate at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Colton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Colton.
- Norway has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 0.0% in Colton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Colton at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Colton | Norway |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (1,114) | 33.5% (156) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (579) | 5.6% (26) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (764) | 10.5% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colton vs Norway
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Colton and Norway at 0.0%.
- In Norway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 22.2% in Colton.
- More residents in Colton have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 10.5% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.