Demographics details for Colton, CA vs Park forest, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colton, CA vs Park forest, IL.
Data | Colton | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,918 | 20,954 |
Median Age | 33.2 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $66,725 | $58,907 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 8.9 |
Population Comparison: Colton vs Park forest
- In Colton, the population is higher at 53,918, compared to 20,954 in Park forest.
- The median age in Park forest is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 33.2 years in Colton.
- Colton has a higher median income of $66,725 compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Colton at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- Colton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 13% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher unemployment rate at 8.9% compared to 5.4% in Colton.
Demographics
Demographics Colton vs Park forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Colton | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 72 |
White | -4 | 17 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 73 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Colton vs Park forest
- In Park forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 9% in Colton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Park forest at 17% compared to -4% in Colton.
- The Asian population is larger in Colton at 3% compared to 0% in Park forest.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Colton at 73% compared to 7% in Park forest.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Colton at 18% compared to 3% in Park forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Colton and Park forest at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Colton | Park forest |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.2% |
Depression | 17.3% | 16.9% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 15.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colton vs Park forest
- More residents in Colton report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Depression is more prevalent in Colton at 17.3% compared to 16.9% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Colton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Park forest at 15.8% compared to 14.7% in Colton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Colton at 39.9% compared to 37.2% in Park forest.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Colton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Colton | Park forest |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (1,094) | 2.4% (503) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (9,295) | 13.4% (2,802) |
Less than High School | 30.0% (16,167) | 8.5% (1,787) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (6,058) | 17.4% (3,650) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colton vs Park forest
- In Park forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.0% in Colton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colton hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- More residents in Colton have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- In Park forest, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 11.2% in Colton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.