Demographics details for Colorado springs, CO vs Bowman, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Colorado springs, CO vs Bowman, SC.

Data Colorado springs Bowman
Population 486,248 769
Median Age 35.1 years 47.2 years
Median Income $79,026 $33,250
Married Families 40.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 11% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Colorado springs vs Bowman

  • In Colorado springs, the population is higher at 486,248, compared to 769 in Bowman.
  • The median age in Bowman is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 35.1 years in Colorado springs.
  • Colorado springs has a higher median income of $79,026 compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Colorado springs at 40.0% compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bowman at 15%, compared to 11% in Colorado springs.
  • Bowman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Colorado springs.

Demographics

Demographics Colorado springs vs Bowman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Colorado springs Bowman
Black 6 66
White 61 33
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Colorado springs vs Bowman

  • In Bowman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 6% in Colorado springs.
  • Colorado springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 33% in Bowman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Colorado springs at 3% compared to 0% in Bowman.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Colorado springs at 18% compared to 0% in Bowman.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Colorado springs at 11% compared to 1% in Bowman.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Colorado springs at 1% compared to 0% in Bowman.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Colorado springs Bowman
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 13.9%
Depression 25.4% 19.3%
Smoking 14.5% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 14.3%
Obesity 28.4% 43.7%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Colorado springs vs Bowman

  • In Bowman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.2% in Colorado springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Colorado springs at 25.4% compared to 19.3% in Bowman.
  • Bowman has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 14.5% in Colorado springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Colorado springs at 15.8% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
  • Bowman has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 28.4% in Colorado springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Colorado springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Colorado springs Bowman
No Schooling 0.7% (3,192) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.2% (49,754) 26.4% (203)
Less than High School 6.8% (33,298) 12.6% (97)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.3% (132,822) 7.3% (56)

Education Levels Comparison: Colorado springs vs Bowman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Colorado springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
  • In Bowman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 10.2% in Colorado springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bowman at 12.6%, compared to 6.8% in Colorado springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Colorado springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.