Demographics details for Colleyville, TX vs Hydro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colleyville, TX vs Hydro, OK.
| Data | Colleyville | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,850 | 898 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $196,298 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Colleyville vs Hydro
- In Colleyville, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- Residents in Colleyville have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 37.3 years in Hydro.
- Colleyville has a higher median income of $196,298 compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Colleyville at 58.0% compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- The poverty level is identical in both Colleyville and Hydro at 0%.
- Hydro has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Colleyville.
Demographics
Demographics Colleyville vs Hydro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Colleyville | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 72 | 76 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Colleyville vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Colleyville at 4% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hydro at 76% compared to 72% in Colleyville.
- The Asian population is larger in Colleyville at 8% compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Colleyville and Hydro at 8%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hydro at 10%, compared to 8% in Colleyville.
- In Hydro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Colleyville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Colleyville | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 8.7% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 27.3% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colleyville vs Hydro
- In Hydro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.0% in Colleyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hydro at 25.9% versus 21.5% in Colleyville.
- Hydro has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 8.7% in Colleyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Colleyville at 19.5% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Hydro has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 27.3% in Colleyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 6.0% in Colleyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Colleyville | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (47) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 3.6% (936) | 27.6% (248) |
| Less than High School | 0.8% (208) | 10.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.3% (12,744) | 19.6% (176) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colleyville vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of residents in Colleyville have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 3.6% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hydro at 10.2%, compared to 0.8% in Colleyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colleyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 19.6% in Hydro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.