Demographics details for Colleyville, TX vs Fort mill, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Colleyville, TX vs Fort mill, SC.
Data | Colleyville | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,850 | 30,940 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $196,298 | $128,125 |
Married Families | 58.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Colleyville vs Fort mill
- The population in Fort mill is higher at 30,940, compared to 25,850 in Colleyville.
- Residents in Colleyville have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Colleyville has a higher median income of $196,298 compared to $128,125 in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Colleyville at 58.0% compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort mill at 5%, compared to 0% in Colleyville.
- Fort mill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Colleyville.
Demographics
Demographics Colleyville vs Fort mill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Colleyville | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 9 |
White | 72 | 79 |
Asian | 8 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Colleyville vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 4% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort mill at 79% compared to 72% in Colleyville.
- The Asian population is larger in Colleyville at 8% compared to 3% in Fort mill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Colleyville at 8% compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Colleyville at 8% compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Colleyville and Fort mill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Colleyville | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 9.4% |
Depression | 21.5% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 8.7% | 12.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 27.3% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Colleyville vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.0% in Colleyville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Colleyville at 21.5% compared to 21.1% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher smoking rate at 12.3% compared to 8.7% in Colleyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Colleyville at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 27.3% in Colleyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Colleyville at 6.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Colleyville | Fort mill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (47) | 0.3% (78) |
High School Diploma | 3.6% (936) | 7.7% (2,372) |
Less than High School | 0.8% (208) | 2.8% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.3% (12,744) | 30.0% (9,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Colleyville vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Colleyville.
- In Fort mill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.7% compared to 3.6% in Colleyville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort mill at 2.8%, compared to 0.8% in Colleyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Colleyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 30.0% in Fort mill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.