Demographics details for College station, TX vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in College station, TX vs Rialto, CA.
Data | College station | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Population | 124,319 | 103,545 |
Median Age | 22.9 years | 31.2 years |
Median Income | $52,397 | $80,750 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: College station vs Rialto
- In College station, the population is higher at 124,319, compared to 103,545 in Rialto.
- The median age in Rialto is higher at 31.2 years, compared to 22.9 years in College station.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $52,397 in College station.
- In Rialto, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 26.0% in College station.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 12% in College station.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.7% in College station.
Demographics
Demographics College station vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | College station | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 12 |
White | 56 | -7 |
Asian | 10 | 2 |
Hispanic | 17 | 75 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: College station vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 8% in College station.
- College station has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in College station at 10% compared to 2% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 17% in College station.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 9% in College station.
- In Rialto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in College station.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | College station | Rialto |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.0% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 32.1% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: College station vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in College station.
- Depression is more prevalent in College station at 23.0% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in College station at 14.4% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- Binge drinking is more common in College station at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Rialto has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 32.1% in College station.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rialto at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in College station.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | College station | Rialto |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (601) | 2.7% (2,754) |
High School Diploma | 4.7% (5,861) | 18.6% (19,301) |
Less than High School | 3.2% (4,000) | 30.0% (31,028) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (30,039) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: College station vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in College station.
- In Rialto, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 4.7% in College station.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 3.2% in College station.
- A higher percentage of residents in College station hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.